Climate "Science" is Climate Mythology.

I believe that the theory of climate change is the secularisation of Original Sin. It says that; to be human is to be bad, according to the climate lobby. That’s the first thing I’d like to say. The second thing is that the whole idea that CO2 drives climate is false. It is an example of the Single Cause Fallacy The single cause fallacy is to take a complex problem and reduce it down to a single cause. We know that the climate is a multifaceted agency and it’s not driven by CO2. It is driven by factors far more powerful than CO2, including the 11-year sunspot cycle. The fact that the moon's orbit is not circular but elliptical, so the gravitational pull at the liquid oceans affects the ocean currents. There are 12 major ocean currents. They are driving climate change, not CO2. The Coriolis effect, which is the fact that the earth is a globe spinning on its axis, causing turbulence in the oceans - that is the cause of climate change: not CO2 Volcanic activity - that is the cause of climate change. And the Earth is a nuclear reactor. The Earth’s mantel has uranium which generates massive heat, enough to heat the planet and turn solid rock into molten lava. That is the cause of climate change not CO2. CO2 may be a cause of climate change but it’s a minor cause of climate change, and the HUMAN part of that CO2 is a minor part of the whole; So to take the activities of human beings and claim that Human activity the cause of the so-called climate change catastrophe is an absolute travesty of science. It’s not climate science - it’s climate mythology. And the last thing I’d like to say is that there was a strategic change from the term “global warming” to the term “climate change”. That is NOT accidental. The climate change” concept is not a scientific concept because it does not make predictions. Climate change is such a broad concept it encompasses everything that happens. If it’s hotter, it’s climate change. If it’s colder, it’s climate change. If it’s wetter, it’s climate change. If it’s drier, it’s climate change. It makes NO predictions and therefore is not a scientific hypothesis. It is - what proper scientists call - a “void hypothesis.” In order to be scientific, a hypothesis has to be able to make predictions which may be tested against experience. The term “global warming” DOES make predictions and it has FAILED every prediction it has made. They cannot get their "global warming" concept to work, so they reduced it down to “climate change” which denotes nothing specific, and so is not a true scientific concept So on all these measures, we can say that the climate change concept is false. If you believe this message is true, please pass it on to your friends, and please Follow our Facebook page.

#thereformparty #reformuk #gloucester #climatechange #ClimateAction #climatecrisis